?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Happy July: Free Books! Cover Competition!

So six of my friends and I were discussing US and UK covers one day, and we compared and constrasted and generally came to very few conclusions about the difference between US and UK covers. We were focusing on young adult covers, as we're all young adult authors, and I thought it might be interesting to share some of our waffling here. Possibly even enlightening!

Okay, it was all Saundra Mitchell's idea and anything enlightening was probably said by her, and definitely not by me.

But as a reward for listening to my babbling, we thought we could give away seven books at once.

In the US, I think young adult fiction is seen as slanted more towards adults, whereas in the UK young adult fiction is seen as slanted more towards kids: with the landslide success of Twilight everywhere this is changing as we speak, but for now I've noticed that in the US teen sections are kept quite separate from and sometimes far away from the children's section, and in the UK they tend to be together and quite often to blend.

So, there's the question of different audiences for the US and UK people.

There's also the question of different sensibilities: I know a couple of US covers that were changed because 'that's too sexy for the UK market.' This overlaps with the question of audience, but might also have something to do with notions of propriety this side of the pond. ;)

And there's the question of timing. Some of us have always loved young adult fiction - for instance, you can try prying my copy of Margaret Mahy's The Changeover out of my cold, dead hands - but it cannot be denied it's exploded in recent years, and especially since Twilight, though there were signs of its rising popularity well before that. And Twilight had a much slower start in the UK than the US - possibly due to their very different covers. So I think the UK is less certain of young adult fiction: it has lots of experiments in style.

One example of such experimentation is a book I know of that was sold as straight-up YA fantasy in the US, was sold as YA fantasy with a different UK cover, and at the same time as adult fantasy with yet another different UK cover and a different title. This was deeply confusing for me. I very nearly bought the same book twice.




Photobucket Photobucket

Uglies by Scott Westerfeld, published in 2005

Here is the first piece of proof that US covers favour photographs of people. It is a Thing. I think this may be the biggest difference between US and UK covers: it's fairly usual for a UK cover for young adults to have an illustrated cover, whereas I've seen few US covers with illustrated people on them, and those that have them tend to trend young.

The UK Uglies cover isn't illustrated, but it is experimental: in a way they're both 'What the heck!' covers. (In my head there are two kinds of covers - covers trying for the reaction of 'Oooh pretty, I shall pick it up!' and covers trying for 'What is that about...? I shall pick it up!' Some covers do both, but I see those as the Two Main Aims.) The US cover makes you go 'What the heck' because of the way the title works with the cover - it's a picture of a girl who as far as we can see is pretty, and yet the title says Uglies. 'What the heck,' we say, and pick it up. The UK cover is of doll parts and medical equipment. Surgery on Barbies? A torture manual for doll haters? 'What the heck' we say, and pick it up.

The system works!

Photobucket Photobucket

Twilight by Stephenie Meyer, published 2006

The US cover for Twilight is pretty well-known, and I have gone on about how it is genius for both being iconic and having a person on it as well.

The UK cover is less well known, as it was rejacketed with the US cover in paperback and has thence rocketed to success. I read it with the UK hardcover, and I showed it around to all my friends and swore it was selling like Harry Potter in the States. 'But we've never even HEARD of it!' they exclaimed. (Now, they have.)

I see the UK cover as an experiment: a photographic cover of a person, yes, but altered to suggest the supernatural. She is all flat (as if someone had taken a rolling pin to her, I am not commenting on Bella Swan's womanly endowments) and ghostly looking: she's near some lockers. The UK cover trends young, too, as it makes it clear the character is going to school.

After realising the US cover does so well, though, the UK publishing industry said to themselves 'Black and red!' As we shall see...

Photobucket Photobucket

City of Bones by Cassandra Clare, published 2007

Both photographic covers, but the US versus UK sensibility is a factor here: the boy on the US cover is foxy, whereas the girl on the UK cover is moody. The US cover has the 'Oooh, someone's shirt is off, LET'S GO! pretty' and the UK cover has the 'what the heck is on that girl's face? Ah, runes!'

Interestingly enough, with the release of the third book the series is being rejacketed in the UK with the US covers.

Photobucket Photobucket

City of Ashes by Cassandra Clare, published 2008

I thought it might be cool to see how series progress when on a different track: the US cover keeps it up with the 'oooh, pretty' this time with sparkling waters and flaming hair rather than shirtlessness (Probably for the best, I for one would be rather startled by Clary's womanly endowments on display). And the UK cover this time is working the attractive guy, in an understated way, and the cover is also a little black and red. Remember those colours!

Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket

Tithe by Holly Black, published 2002

'Sarah' you might well say. 'Why is this all the way down here when it's the earliest? Also why are there THREE COVERS explain yourself!'

So the middle cover is the US hardcover of Tithe, which was rejacketed into the last cover for the US paperback. (This happens, and in fact one day I may do a post on the changes of some books from hardcover to paperback. But not today!) But since we in the UK are suckers for our illustration, the middle cover was what was used as the first paperback edition over here. (That's the one I own, incidentally. If it is rare and coveted by others, I shall be much pleased.)

Then the UK cover was changed to reflect the US cover, and then in 2008 the first cover in the line-up, and the first original UK cover, was put on UK bookshelves.

This one is a little tricky, I realise. But the US paperback is one of the Very First YA iconic covers against a dark background, and we can see how it had babies like Twilight.

The UK cover isn't illustrated (as we'd already had an illustrated Tithe) but it does have a fairytalesque quality I think, and it also has masses and masses of foil.

(And if you think three covers is tricky, I could have shown you the new UK adult editions, and the new US covers coming out soon: I had mercy and did not complicate things further.)

Photobucket Photobucket

Valiant by Holly Black, published 2005

But same deal as with the first book in the series: the first original UK cover was published in 2008. Remember I told you guys to watch for black and red? Here it is, accompanied by tons of foil (in an iron fretwork pattern, which fits nicely with the book). And the US: icon against dark background, much more obviously fitting in with a series than the UK cover does - different views on companion novels? Who can tell.

Photobucket Photobucket

The Summoning by Kelley Armstrong, published 2008

Illustrated UK cover, photographic with person US cover, and the UK cover has a lighter background: if moodiness is to be had, it's in the rather Gothic-looking house. The look of the UK cover also fits in with the UK covers for Kelley Armstrong's adult series, and in fact I often see it shelved in the adult section.

Also interestingly, the sequel The Awakening has the same cover in the UK as in the US - girl in moody light, holding a necklace, as on the first book's US cover.

Photobucket Photobucket

The Devouring by Simon Holt, published 2008.

This UK cover is experimental too - I have to say, it kind of gives me nightmares! And it's a huge contrast with the mellow US one, as well as being another example of illustrated and photographic covers. I have one theory about this book, which is that since the author's got a boy's name and boys are statistically more likely to read books by boys, the UK cover and its horror edge is designed to appeal most to boys. Whereas girls statistically read more full stop, and the US cover is designed to appeal to them. Different audiences in two senses of the world!

Plus an example of the pretty cover (US) versus the 'What the heck' cover, as in 'What the heck is up with that guy's face? Pick it up!' (Oh my God his faaaaace ohhhh myyyyy Gooooood.)

Photobucket Photobucket

The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins, published 2008

The UK cover, as we can see, illustrated person, and black and red! And the US cover, iconic against a dark background.

Early versions of the UK cover folded out to show another character against a blue background, and I own that version: cool diversifying extra feature, also possibly giving a younger impression than the US cover.

Photobucket Photobucket

Ash by Malinda Lo, published 2009 (not yet)

And spot the UK cover: trending younger, and distinctly fairytalesque: in this case very appropriately, as the book is about Cinderella. The UK cover highlights that by the edge-of-Disney but atmospheric illustration and the telling glass slipper, and the US one does something different but very clever: the icon against the dark moody background is a person! Curled up to look like a cinder. Very well played.

And to examine those of the seven participants who have US and UK covers to examine:

Photobucket Photobucket

Knife or Spell Hunter by R.J. Anderson, published 2009

Both of these books are illustrated, which is rare! And the US one looks designed for a younger audience to me: in fact I was signing in Harrods a couple of weeks ago, and the bookseller there had ordered in the US copy because she thought it'd fly off her shelves. So I think this is a US cover with a lot of UK sensibility.

But the moodier, iconic UK cover has specific art on it: it has art by Brian Froud, a UK artist who a lot of people in the UK are going to recognise. (Other people too, but tons of UK people.) So it's a clever cover for over here because the feeling of familiarity will make people stop and pick it up. And it's very pretty, with lots of foil: the UK does undoubtedly like its foil. More on that...

Photobucket Photobucket

Wings by Aprilynne Pike, published 2009

Both of these covers are iconic and both are photographic, but the UK cover (as UK covers do) trends a little younger to me - bright colours, snazzy font, lots of foil. Whereas the US cover has a moodier, darker look, fitting in with iconic covers like Twilight, Tithe and Hunger Games. Note the foil thing: see, I told you the UK seems to really like foil. I can take out Knife and Wings and tilt them up to the light and be entertained for hours and - minutes. Yep, minutes. Very few of them. I'm a grown-up. Swear.

Photobucket Photobucket

The Forest of Hands and Teeth by Carrie Ryan, published 2009

Iconic and photographic cover: the photographic cover is the US cover, natch, and the UK cover is black and red.

An interesting thing about UK and US sensibilities here: several of the seven discussing this were halted by the UK cover, going 'Yes but what IS that image?' Whereas I, the one used to UK covers, said 'Naturally it is a skeleton hand beckoning/skeletal leaf thing!' I don't know whether this means my side of the pond likes something convoluted, but thinking about some European movies, signs could point to yes...

Photobucket Photobucket

The Demon's Lexicon by Sarah Rees Brennan, published 2009

Analysing your own covers is the very hardest, as one is tempted to go 'OH MY BABY FLAIL!' but see how the pattern continues. My UK cover is illustrated, and my US cover is photographic: they both have the pretty cover thing going on (as hello, attractive young men) and though it cannot be seen here, the title of the UK cover is foil.

And the UK cover is black and red: to which, no objection in life. Good colours, and good company!



Now, having seen so many US versus UK covers, you probably have opinions. You probably have favourites.

I cannot hear them. (NO. SERIOUSLY. PLEASE DO NOT TELL ME. SERIOUSLY, PLEASE DO NOT.) Books are not significantly like our children, as selling one's children in the marketplace is frowned on by many. But book covers are like our children's faces in a way - they mean a lot to us, and we don't have control over them. They're also marketing tools, so people should feel free to express their opinions on them: but doing it to the author is liable to just make the author collapse in a tragic heap of smelling salts and brandy. (Medicinal, of course!)

I would like to hear anyone's thoughts on the trends in covers on both sides of the pond, possibly how US covers sometimes get new covers in paperback but never adopt the UK ones, and how the UK industry often changes to the US covers to see what will happen. I'd also like to hear guesses on what the UK covers of the other three of the seven debaters - Saundra Mitchell of Shadowed Summer, Sarah MacLean of The Season and Sarah Cross of Dull Boy - would look like.

But if you want to pick favourites, good news, that's how you win seven books at once!

Photobucket

Go here to vote for Team US or Team UK, and possibly win either the seven books in the UK package complete with UK covers, or the seven books in the US package complete with US covers.

Comments

( 183 comments — Leave a comment )
Page 4 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
alioli
Jun. 30th, 2009 06:29 pm (UTC)
Huh. I didn't know there was a UK cover for Twilight! (Or any other cover but the US one for that matter). I quite like it. Which is odd, since it looks a bit like the Spanish covers for Stieg Larsson's books, which make me incredibly uneasy. Extreme thinness and pointy elbows and physical abuse and fragility! I have to take the dust jacket off the books in order to read them (it's a case of 'what the heck, ewwwww!!!' I suppose ;D) I guess illustrated covers are riskier that way? It's probably harder to cause an bad reaction if you use photos of real things or people.

Also, I'm not telling you my preferences for I respect your wish of staying away from the brandy, but I see quite a few covers I'll be looking for. :) I usually order the UK version purely because shipping costs are lower that way, but since the Book Depository is all kinds of lovely and useful and stores all sorts of prittiful covers and charges nothing at all for shipping said covers, I think I can afford to have more international shelves now. Hooray! :)

P.S. It amuses me that Nick is following the red-and-black trend. Mae would be proud! :)
sarahtales
Jun. 30th, 2009 06:35 pm (UTC)
*amused* Would she be? Why d'you think so?

The Twilight US cover is pretty predominant, but this is the German cover - not changed to reflect the US cover, as far as I know, and it does very well!

Photobucket
(no subject) - alioli - Jun. 30th, 2009 07:34 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - sarahtales - Jun. 30th, 2009 07:41 pm (UTC) - Expand
fleurrochard
Jun. 30th, 2009 06:47 pm (UTC)
I actually quite like the German cover of your book, which looks rather different than the UK or US covers. (Those are pretty too, of course!)

Also, I really loved your book - I started to read it one night, thinking I'd just read the first chapter and then go to sleep.
200 pages later I forced myself to shut off the light because it was 4 am and I had to work early. *coughs*
greenfaeriedust
Jun. 30th, 2009 06:55 pm (UTC)
Ooh! I love comparisons like this! I was reading this on my iPhone in work today, and when my work colleague asked me what was so fascinating I told her... I don't think she shared my interest. : ( She also looked kind of moody when I explained that the sentence she used to discipline the children was a double negative... Oops, my bad.

Just wanted to say, I love black and red, I love Iconic, I love foil and I love illustrations, particularly abstract ones. These are the covers I am most likely to pounce on at my bookstore. You showed some of my favourite books up there and they made me sigh happily. : ) 3 of the books on that prize list are the next 3 on my purchasing list so i shall have them soon no matter what! Hoorah! *soaks into book love*
(Deleted comment)
sarahtales
Jun. 30th, 2009 07:42 pm (UTC)
*beams* I am so pleased you're liking the book! And that the writing style works for you, natch.

I am pleased you like the post too, but am most pleased about the book.
(Deleted comment)
sarahtales
Jun. 30th, 2009 07:38 pm (UTC)
www.thebookdepository.co.uk has free shipping, and a selection of covers, if that helps? ;)

I know what you mean about the Morganville Vampires series, I once, uh *coughs* crawled under a table with them to see them glow. In front of the author...
jliann
Jun. 30th, 2009 07:47 pm (UTC)
I've always understood jacket changes as a sort of necessity, but title changes confuzzle the hell out of me. Especially when I've also been in danger of buying the same book twice.

Also, I tend to think of illustrated covers as more appropriate for the fantasy genre, no matter what age group it's aimed at, and I will happily swap all the photographic covers on my adult fantasy books for illustrated ones! (Though sadly, this isn't really possible and is only wishful thinking)

I usually think a drawing can go a lot further towards expressing the true images of a fantasy book than a manipulated photograph can. Thus, it doesn't come across as "aimed towards young'uns" at all.
ladyknight1991
Jun. 30th, 2009 09:00 pm (UTC)
actually i just think the guy on DEMON Lexicon's cover in the UK is cuter...that's just me...if i were to pick a favourite thats why...i am shallow like that....oh god are you going to writhe on the floor now with your *medicinal* brandy? dont! ohmygod i am sorry!
...i will stop now
faintheart
Jun. 30th, 2009 09:07 pm (UTC)
I'm not saying I like one cover more than the other, *worries about your blood alcohol level*, but I was surprised to discover the the UK cover matches the image of Nick in my head much more closely than the US cover does. I don't remember seeing the UK cover before, but I could have seen it and just forgotten.
tumbling0after
Jun. 30th, 2009 10:03 pm (UTC)
VERY intriguing post - and so many pretty pictures!

I shall say nothing of my personal preferences as per your request, except that I think ALL covers are lovely! well, "lovely" might not be the word for some of them (ahem UK cover of The Devouring,) but awesome in some way shape or form!

As for the trending - I find it interesting that you see UK YA leaning toward children's and US leaning toward adult. What it really seems like to me is that in the US, kids are getting older even younger, so having covers that suggest something sexy and chic and worldly makes the tweens and teens more likely to buy. (look at television - these shows are all about high-school aged kids going off and being married and preggers and all manner of things - it's like kids playing house. but I digress...)

I wonder when YA becomes adult, content-wise? I mean, I love YA, though sometimes I get a hankering to read stories about people who are my own age (20-something) or older. Do you know offhand of any fantastic books with heroes/heroines in that age group?

ANYWAY, I rather like the Dull Boy cover, with it's light background. My guess is that the UK version will be darker - perhaps just his hand/fist and lots of red accents. not like blood - like happier red, for power and strength. perhaps some foil? :)
sarahtales
Jun. 30th, 2009 10:07 pm (UTC)
People in their twenties, hmmm. Diana Peterfreund wrote the Tap and Gown series for college age folk, and in terms of fantasy, Kate Daniels and Mercy Thompson (stars of the series...eses of same name by Ilona Andrews and Patricia Briggs) are both in their mid-twenties. Oh and Dimestore Magic by Kelley Armstrong has a heroine and hero in their early twenties, and is highly recommended!
(no subject) - tumbling0after - Jun. 30th, 2009 10:39 pm (UTC) - Expand
lavinialavender
Jun. 30th, 2009 11:14 pm (UTC)
Lol. Okay, I will stop telling you my favorites and personal opinions. But covers are very interesting things, and I'm glad you're doing these studies.

And as for why the U.S. never adopts UK covers - duh, we have a massive superiority complex and it would never occur to us that someone else's might be better. *eyeroll*
zeffy_amethyst
Jun. 30th, 2009 11:14 pm (UTC)
From what I remember in ordering your book from Angus & Robertson, the paperback was in the UK cover and the hardback in the US cover. So I don't know if Australia just likes to mix and match or whether there's reasoning behind their choices.
zeffy_amethyst
Jun. 30th, 2009 11:16 pm (UTC)
Although, I have noticed this trend for YA book covers becoming...'sexier' I suppose. I wonder if it was like that before the explosion of Twilight.
(Anonymous)
Jun. 30th, 2009 11:45 pm (UTC)
There seems to be a mix of both UK and US covers here in Australia. Personally, I prefer the UK covers. Sure there are some exceptions (there always are) like "Ash", "Wings" and "Twilight" to utilise a few of your examples. Those covers are much more simple, bordering on elegant.

I am, however, a grown-up (according to my driver's licence anyway) so my tastes would not necessarily be what the marketing department is looking for when trying to seel a book to young adults!
wild_magic
Jun. 30th, 2009 11:47 pm (UTC)
I won't enter as I already own them all. : )
I just wanted to throw a comment in about Australia's trends with covers. We very rarely will have our own new cover for a book, the publishers will decide if we get UK or US. Quite often we will get the UK covers, as you guys are kind of like our older sibling we look up too, but we also sometimes rebel and get the US one, who is like the kid at school we are trying to impress. (I think anyway)This is how random it is:
We got the US cover of Uglies, City of Bones, City of Ashes, Valiant and the Devouring.
Tithe we got in the US paperback cover originally, and then switched to the UK with the foil covered ones. We did the opposite of that for Twilight we took the same track as the UK, we started with the squished locker detective girl, and then got the US cover and it took off.
AND we got the UK covers for Summoning, Hunger Games (although we are going to get the US one for #2), Knife, Forest of Hands & Teeth and the Demons Lexicon.
Sometimes the publishers make the right choice on cover, sometimes they make stupid choices, and we will sneakily order in the other cover. : )
Also our young adult section is in the children’s section as well, seen as something that you grow out of at 17 (I still haven’t though) but many of the titles you have mentioned are in our Paranormal/urban fantasy section, in the adult books, as teens will go looking for books over there, and so do adults, If we put books there they will often sell better.
sarahtales
Jul. 1st, 2009 01:57 am (UTC)
Oh that's interesting to hear about Australia and the way it handles YA: and I might add that when Australia does do covers, it does them right: the Australian cover of Liar by Justine Larbalestier is so brilliant, it is the one I must own.
(no subject) - wild_magic - Jul. 1st, 2009 02:06 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - fadedbluejeans - Jul. 1st, 2009 03:41 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - wild_magic - Jul. 1st, 2009 04:00 am (UTC) - Expand
(Anonymous)
Jun. 30th, 2009 11:58 pm (UTC)
Cover Trends
I started reading YA classic fiction, especially UK work, alongside my SF/Fantasy habit. Current favorite- the original Fell Farms series covers, with their lovely watercolors of the Lakes. It seems to me that US YA books really push the illustration of a face, as opposed to a whole person. (Twilight being an obvious exception to this rule) I am anziously awaiting Nick and Co.- your Big Idea post sent me running to the computer to order it. Now I just have to make sure that I get to the box before my sister does.
sarahtales
Jul. 1st, 2009 01:55 am (UTC)
Re: Cover Trends
I just found a cover on google images - Marjorie Lloyd, yes? They are nice covers: the kind James Herriot should've had, I think.

I beam and hope you will like Nick & Co. ;) And beat out your sister, of course.
imagined_away
Jul. 1st, 2009 12:28 am (UTC)
Can I choose both? There are books I like from both.

But I must make two comments.
One: I hate when titles change from the UK to the US.
Two: I picked up City of Bones DESPITE the shirtless guy on the cover. I was a little horrified by all the glittering teenage boy on the book cover. That said I like the US cover more I think.
Also is that Clary on the UK cover looking all moody?
sarahtales
Jul. 1st, 2009 01:51 am (UTC)
Title changes are rather conflizzing: see me almost buying the same book twice!

I think it is Clary, yes, but I suppose it could be Isabelle.
Page 4 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
( 183 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

unmade
sarahtales
Sarah Rees Brennan
Sarah's Lexicon

Latest Month

August 2019
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

sarahreesbrennan@gmail.com

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow